As one might expect, LGBTQIA+ perspectives in my data, and those of their family members and allies, differed sharply from those that one might call “right-leaning.” (I use that term, along with “left-leaning,” as the most suitable way I could find for characterizing the two sides in the debates I studied, both politically and theologically.) Numerous right-leaning participants posted “warnings” that God would judge LGBTQIA+ people, and explained that such warnings were a sign of true love. However, the posts were uniformly received as hateful by those to whom they were addressed. One right-leaner seems to have recognized this, noting that “anything else” besides “I affirm you. Your lifestyle is acceptable” would be received as hate. A left-leaner who is lesbian responded, “we ARE acceptable,” signifying that right-leaners’ mention of “lifestyle” does not register as something that can be set apart from the people who live it. In any case, the use of “lifestyle” to obliquely refer to someone’s sexual practices is problematic in itself: as one gay participant put it, “you have no idea what my ‘lifestyle’ is.”